Legend of a Person Getting Young Again

You know about how individuals gain control of the power of the State then abuse that power like quondam US President George "Dubya" Bush-league?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly assisting for some Usa businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'off-white game' for Bush UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported by United kingdom Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to bring together the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not exist just which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If yous recall that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hours.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the affliction came about as a outcome of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly diet and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

In that location was a nasty affliction chosen smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was particularly the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading affliction: London's first park built after rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The center and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would go on them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could reach this past ensuring the then truly "groovy unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now y'all can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its part in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Physician – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Mortality- UK, Us & SWEDEN

In the graphs below discover the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the Great britain, more than people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the affliction dimished with improved living standards and was non vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells united states of america. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the Great britain and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox decease rates plummeted [come across table below].  Leicester's approach also price far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Volume as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Pocket-sized-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland)	1860-1908	one,355	96	7.1
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	eleven.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.viii
Royal Navy	1860-1908	two,909	234	8.0
Thou Totals and example fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upwards vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-charge per unit separately and together, so that they may be compared either manner with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would take soared with a respective issue—but on the opposite side."

Table 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-scale-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	ix,659	1,594	xvi.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	xi.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	nine.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching influenza flavour and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, y'all might be wondering where the thought of vaccination got its get-go. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavor to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same bones tale of the bright ascertainment of a simple land doc and his backbone in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or every bit it was often called the speckled monster. In a contempo and pop volume, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year quondam male child named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'south hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but nothing more than. Afterwards, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a total-diddled, admitting balmy, case of the illness. Nil happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox over again; once more, zip. [one]

Edward Jenner's thought somewhen became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin give-and-take for cow – vacca. Information technology was originally referred to equally cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. Equally the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would exist freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" take been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to back up a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatever unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western globe by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with noesis of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The thought behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would practise meliorate confronting the affliction than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the future.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically adept. Only because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an performance that could simply be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was however an estimated 2-5% that died equally a issue.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality charge per unit in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the departure in bloodshed due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

There was one major and mostly unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious illness and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and establish that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increment that danger; the practice of Inoculation plainly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would non otherwise have been produced; the identify where information technology is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very profoundly past Inoculation . . .[7]

Even so, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had get a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically connected by about of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

At present enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-yr-old boy named James Phipps. He took affliction affair that he believed to exist cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with information technology. He after deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to see if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with just rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the employ of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would exist allowed to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Just he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where pocket-sized-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning at that place were problems with Jenner'due south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by beingness inoculated with smallpox to meet if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatsoever of them. Jenner received the study simply decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession as the respond to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs connected to encompass Jenner'due south ideas among numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated past Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the stop of the year 1799. A calendar month later on it was inoculated with modest-pox matter without outcome, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Take a chance, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Vii years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. iii and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of historic period, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-scale-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was curtained. 14. The kid of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is substantially the same fatality rate equally smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination past the well-nigh skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with xxx years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine exercise." Merely subsequently vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the hope of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even dice from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the exercise.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the fourth dimension were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to comprehend it every bit a new form of income. It is therefore quite pregnant for a doctor to accept spoken out against it as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, ii [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub about the pocket-sized-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-scale-pox before, and ofttimes severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some lone, just fell upon slap-up numbers.[xiv]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English language pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-scale-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" course, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but equally failures increased there was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh cloth straight from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later enquiry determined that this was nothing more than the former exercise of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Non merely was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were also reports of deaths from other causes before long after vaccination. For case, a skin status called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful mode to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "modest-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; 1 cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; 2 good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the University at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. Just facts accumulated more and more than, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practice this very reluctantly. Now I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial arrangement intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nil to curb the trouble of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, there were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most astringent smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no outcome at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years subsequently the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination fabricated smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were fabricated that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every ten years.[25]

While the bulk of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were existence made past vaccinators. Immense financial proceeds combined with the force of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators accept received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get almost a quarter 1000000. Other sums, also, which I cannot proper name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has e'er a quack remedy produced then much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A not bad pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war there were xx-three one thousand iv hundred and threescore-nine cases of minor-pox in that regular army. The London Lancet of July fifteen, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, 6 chiliad eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than ane hundred and twenty-2 g vaccinated persons accept suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany testify that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from pocket-size-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motion. People began to resist the authorities and chose to pay fines. Some fifty-fifty accustomed imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the bang-up demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the utilize of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to ten%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and constructive means that eliminated the need for vaccination. Notwithstanding, in that location were dire predictions from the majority of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town'due south residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would somewhen be plagued with disaster never did come to laissez passer. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[thirty] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a dandy manufacturing boondocks having a population of almost a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when 90-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was frequently promoted as a safe procedure, information technology often caused sickness or even expiry. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed charge per unit vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other furnishings of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the finish of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its loftier expiry rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed i in 5 of its victims to i that just killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and afterwards to as low as 1 in 380. The illness could however kill, but having become and then much milder, it was often mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the S and afterward gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was ordinarily at offset mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease rate was effectually twenty%, as information technology had been historically. The tabular array also showed that after 1896 the decease rate fell off rapidly, starting with vi% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. Equally the balmy form of smallpox replaced the archetype blazon, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a pocket-size communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important considering information technology oft gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new grade of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the illness is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the ramble symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage charge per unit, at that place was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the concluding smallpox death in the United States in 1948 upwards until 1963. This resulted in an estimated v,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 written report detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now existence termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in 20,000 to one in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] However, they acknowledged that almost cases were non reported and there was no accurate accounting on this effect of vaccination. There were too an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the issue of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time in that location had only been 1 smallpox decease in 1948.[36]

The concluding smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is all the same occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his military father after the father was vaccinated. Subsequently a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother likewise required handling and virus was found all over the business firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been fifty-fifty higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a mod wellness-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire world?

There were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which one time had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are aback to jettison the idea completely and peradventure afraid that if we did the accident of some hereafter epidemic might put us in the wrong. We adopt to let compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious plenty to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as almost the only medically promoted mode to deal with affliction, there were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual food product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. M. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the commodity on the utilize of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" equally applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable every bit a safety in modest-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed 2 table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for xiv days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while among those under ordinary treatment the bloodshed was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fright of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar every bit a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used 3 or 4 times a twenty-four hours to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the front in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Any person who has been exposed demand have no fear of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar iii or iv times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at final is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, but merely because well-nigh people have been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and haemorrhage. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a affliction that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or simply an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of good for you collagen. Collagen is the poly peptide that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and too gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a consequence, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King's Higher, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California lord's day. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, equally living almost entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates information technology. This is washed down with copious librations of potent coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the nutrition of thousands for months, nether a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the about intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil State of war twice every bit many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases equally those killed in boxing.[44] For case, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such equally smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for but a pocket-sized fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for ane percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping coughing and measles occurred earlier vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the globe from the destruction of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to exist echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine organized religion. But the true history shows usa a unlike reality.

The brand proper noun of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche equally something to protect someone from an disease. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is cipher close to the myth.

Other extremely effective culling methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'southward groovy discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are at present a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the proper name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the pall has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a practiced idea to y'all?

More data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
ane.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
iii.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
four.Frederick F. Cartwright, Illness and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Commencement Planting, Progressive Improvements and Nowadays State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Nihon, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard'due south Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
nine.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Periodical and Review, vol. Eight, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Periodical, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
xiv."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
xvi.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present Land of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Doctor-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Dr., "Fractional Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the The states," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Forenoon Relate, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, Feb 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, Feb 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Picket, April 1911, vol. 19, no. iv, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, MD, "A Physician's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June ane, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
xxx.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Pocket-sized-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease as Shown past the History of Smallpox in the U.s.," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Factory Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Toll Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume i, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Physician and Howard A. Joos Medico, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biological science and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January i, 1938, pp. 48-49.
forty."Acerb Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. ane, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Half-dozen, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Study of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Kid Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

ingramhabound.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post